In the alleged disproportionate assets case against Congress leader and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the lawyer representing the central investigating agencies, “If the matter was that serious, why did the probe agencies keep quiet?” The apex court also asked the Allahabad High Court not to proceed with the case against Gandhi.
Published: August 17, 2026, 5:31 PM IST
Share Article
https://www.india.com/news/india/why-did-you-keep-quiet-supreme-court-central-agencies-rahul-gandhi-disproportionate-assets-case-congress-allahabad-high-court-cbi-enforcement-directorate-cji-surya-kant-kapil-sibal-vignesh-shishir-8503639/
(File image: X/@INCIndia)
New Delhi: In the alleged disproportionate assets case against Congress leader and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the lawyer representing the central investigating agencies, “If the matter was that serious, why did the probe agencies keep quiet?” The apex court also asked the Allahabad High Court not to proceed with the case against Gandhi.
The SC also directed the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate not to submit any probe report to any authority, including the Allahabad High Court, in connection with the alleged assets case arising from an investigation ordered by the high court.
Read more:
Jharkhand students protest big update: Rahul Gandhi backs protesters, writes to ally CM Hemant Soren
The bench, comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, was hearing a plea filed by the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, against the high court order.
It asked the Allahabad High Court to defer its August 20 hearing in the matter until it hears the case next.
Kapil Sibal, representing Rahul Gandhi, questioned the locus standi of the petitioner, Vignesh Shishir, to file a petition in the high court.
“This is absolutely unknown to lawThis is a witch-hunt process which is not recognised by lawThis is most unfortunateAttempts after attempt are being made by this very petitioner,” Sibal stated, adding, “May I only say, the CBI has done nothing except verifying the complaint.”
Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for the central probe agencies, said they have no role in the case so far, and if the complaint discloses commission of cognisable offences, then it is very serious.
“We are not concerned with thatSuppose somebody commits murder, etc., police do not need permissionBut what appears to us is, subject to the assistance provided to us from both sides, if the court wants to issue a direction, it is expected to follow the principle of natural justice,” said the Chief Justice.
The petitioner, Vignesh Shishir, who appeared online, opposed Gandhi’s plea against the high court order“This is a simple pre-FIR stage caseThe accused doesn’t have any right to be heard in the pre-FIR stage,” he said.
“Facts may be right, facts may be wrongBut if the facts are right, it’s a gross case to use the court’s jurisdiction,” Sibal said.
At this point, the court asked the agencies’ lawyer what they were doing until now if the charges were that serious.
“If it is so serious, why has your agency kept quiet? Do you need a direction from the Court, Mr Raju? Have you taken any suo motu action? No, right?” Justice Bagchi asked the law officer representing the probe agencies.
Expressing dissatisfaction with the CBI’s response, the Allahabad High Court’s Lucknow bench on July 20 directed the agency’s senior officer to personally file a fresh affidavit detailing the progress made in the probe into allegations of disproportionate assets against Gandhi.
The high court had also observed that if, during the course of its inquiry, the ED comes across material and documents indicating any illegality, it would be free to proceed further in accordance with law.
Gandhi had earlier approached the Supreme Court challenging the order of the High Court, which directed the CBI and ED to verify the allegations of disproportionate assets against him.
